The Words We Use
A small glossary for a different way of thinking about food
Somewhere along the way, I started noticing that the words we’d been handed for our struggle with food were doing quiet harm. Broken. Willpower. Addict. Treat. Off-plan. Each one carried an assumption I’d never agreed to — and once I questioned the word, the whole feeling underneath it started to change.
So over the years I built a different vocabulary — not to be clever, but because the words we use really are sentences, in both meanings of that word. They’re what we say, and they’re what we’re condemned to. Change the word, and sometimes the sentence lifts.
Here are the ones that matter most. You don’t have to adopt any of them. Try them on; keep the ones your body believes.
The reframes everything else grows from
The Box
People assume the box in the title is the diet, the plan, the food rules. It isn’t. The box was never the content of what you believed — it was the certitude with which you believed it. A certainty held so tightly it can’t be turned over, arrived so early it feels like the ground itself: I have no self-control. This is just who I am. I’ve tried everything. The case closes before any questioning can begin, and then you live inside the closed case.
Thinking outside the box doesn’t mean being clever, or contrarian, or adopting my beliefs instead — that would just be a new box with better wallpaper. It means noticing which of your certainties has quietly become the walls, picking it up, and turning it over in the light. Reframing opens doors. It never installs replacements.
Sophisticated, not broken
The reframe the whole approach grows from. Your patterns aren’t evidence of a defect — they’re evidence of a system that adapted intelligently, often very early, to keep you safe, comforted, and regulated. The word arrived in my own life when I was six.
The Gift of Food Dysfunction
Your food dysfunction isn’t your problem — it’s your solution, or it was, for a long time. Food worked. It was reliable, available, and biochemically effective at calming an activated nervous system. Naming it a gift doesn’t mean being grateful for the pain; it means recognizing the intelligence that’s been trying to serve you all along.
The Master Reframer
What you become as you practice. Not someone who’s memorized a set of better beliefs, but someone who can take any certainty — about food, about themselves, about their life — hold it up to the light, and ask whether it’s actually true. Reframing is the master skill. Everything else is an application of it.
You were never broken. You were biological.
The sentence I come back to. In gentler moments it becomes: you were human, you were carrying a lot, your nervous system was working, you were doing the best you could. The first half never changes. Only what follows.
Food, and what isn’t
NF — Not Food
My deliberate change from a term some programs use, “NMF — Not My Food.” I dropped the “my,” because “Not My Food” makes it personal and forbidden, as though the fault were yours. It isn’t.
Food nurtures our cells — that’s what food is. NF is what we reach for to nurture the soul: the eating we do when we’re sad, or happy, or grieving, or tired. It’s defined by the reaching, not the substance — the same food can be nourishment one day and NF the next. And here’s the tender part: nurturing the soul is a real and worthy need. There’s no shame in ever having tried to meet it this way. It’s only that food was never the best tool for it — and once you see that, you find so many other things that nurture the soul far more truly. That’s not deprivation. That’s discernment.
Ultra-processed garbage (also NF)
There’s one kind of NF I hold apart from all the rest, and drawing this line has been one of the most freeing things I’ve done. The ultra-processed substances engineered to hit the bliss point — what I call garbage, or, on the honest days, poison — are, for me, what alcohol is to an alcoholic. It’s all still Not Food. This is just the part with teeth.
Here’s why the distinction matters so much. An alcoholic doesn’t struggle with tea and coffee. She struggles with alcohol, specifically — and that precision is what makes recovery possible, because the fight is against one clear thing, not against every drink she might ever have. When we lump all food together as “bad,” we declare war on eating itself, and no one wins that war. But when you can see that these particular engineered substances are the alcohol — and everything else is just food — the struggle narrows to something you can actually meet. The addictive agent was never a molecule. It was a formulation. Naming it for what it is lets me hold it with healthy respect, set it down, and stop fighting the tea and coffee.
Redefining “Treat”
One word quietly colonized our thinking about reward, celebration, and self-care. But what if most of what culture calls a “treat” is actually treating you like someone who doesn’t deserve real nourishment? A treat can be a walk in the woods at peak autumn, a moment of genuine presence, the company of someone you love — the things your sophisticated system actually craves.
From Deprivation to Discernment
The shift that ends the fight. Saying “no thank you” to an engineered substance stops being self-denial and becomes self-respect — not because you’re forbidding yourself something good, but because you finally understand what it actually is, and you have other ways now to meet the need underneath it.
The Helper Reframe
Instead of treating a compulsive relationship with a substance as a monster to slay, you thank it. You ask: what have you been doing for me? The answer is usually tender — comfort when alone, something to feel when everything was numb, predictable pleasure in chaos. It was never making you weak. It was trying to keep you sane. Then you ask the real question: what would meeting that need look like, in a way that truly serves me?
The noise, and the quiet
The Noise / the Hum
The Noise is the loud, reactive, ambushing pull — food chatter, urgency, the sense of being run by something. The Hum is the same system at ease: quiet, automatic, no longer in charge of you. The work isn’t to silence the system. It’s to move, more days than not, from the Noise to the Hum.
Turn Down the Noise
The whole aim, in four words. Not “stop eating that,” not “try harder” — just turn down the volume on the reaching, patiently, over a good while, so you can hear yourself again and choose from a settled place.
The Touchstone
The daily practice at the heart of the Quiet Protocol — and the smallest practice I have ever taught. Twice a day, morning and evening, you pause and ask the only question that ever actually helped: what’s true in there right now? Not “was I good today.” Not “what did I eat.” Just the weather inside. Noise, or hum? The whole thing fits in the time it takes a kettle to think about boiling.
The name is literal. A touchstone was a real stone once, used to test whether a metal was genuine — and I keep an actual stone on my kitchen counter with exactly that job: twice a day it asks me what’s genuine in there. No app required, no streak counted, nothing to lose. Missed days aren’t broken chains; drift is information, and the Touchstone is simply where you return.
The neon sign
What a craving becomes once you’ve done enough of this work. It stops being a verdict that ambushes you and becomes a signal you can see coming from a distance — a light that flares up, often before you even reach, saying: pause, notice, ask what you actually need. The urge doesn’t have to vanish. It only has to become legible.
The Quiet
Not silence, and not the absence of appetite. The Quiet is what’s underneath the Noise once the volume comes down — the state where food goes back to being food, where a kitchen is just a room, where you can hear your own actual wants because nothing is shouting over them. Most of us have touched it in passing — a vacation week, a season of being deeply okay — and assumed it was a fluke. It wasn’t a fluke. It was your baseline, briefly uncovered.
It’s also why my programs carry the name — the Quiet Protocol, the Quiet Food Walk, the Quiet Hour. They’re named for the destination, not the method, because the destination was never thinness or discipline or a finished checklist. It was quiet. Different doors, same room.
Boundaries, drift, and getting back
Sacred boundary (not a rigid rule)
They can look identical from the outside — the same action, the same line. But a rigid rule is imposed on you from outside, in fear, and when you drift it shatters. A sacred boundary is one you’ve questioned and chosen, from a settled place, because your body told you the truth and you’re finally listening. When you drift, a rule breaks. A boundary holds.
Somebody set the test
Every rule you’ve ever been graded by had an author. The chart that named your correct body was built by particular people, in a particular year, for purposes that had nothing to do with you. The program that called an evening “a failure” was written by someone. The voice in your head keeping score learned its scoring from somewhere. None of it arrived from the sky. Somebody set the test.
And here is the tender part, and the part I refuse to skip: most of them were certain they were helping. The doctor, the program founder, the parent — they held their certainty exactly the way you’ve held yours. So the move is not to hate the test-setters, and it is definitely not to erase their certainty and install your own new one in its place — that’s the same error wearing a different face. The move is simply to notice that the test was written by a person, not by reality. A test written by a person can be questioned. And you are allowed to put your pencil down.
Drift is information, not failure
When you move away from your intentions, that’s data about what your system needed, what the load was, what went unmet — not proof of a defect. The drift is worth reading, not punishing.
The Compassionate Return
How you come back after drifting — without the beating-up that usually follows. Imperfect practice, returned to gently and often, builds more real change than perfect plans held in fear ever could. The returning is the practice.
Off-track (never “off-plan”)
A small but deliberate word choice. “Off-plan” makes a rigid document the authority. “Off-track” keeps you and your direction at the center — a track can be rejoined anywhere, without a verdict.
More days than not
The honest standard, in place of perfection. Not every day. Not a clean streak. Just — more days than not. That’s enough for the brain to learn, and it’s a standard a human life can actually meet.
Floor, not target
A target is something you aim at, which means it’s something you can miss — and missing is where the whole old story restarts. A floor is different. A floor is the least you’ll do on the worst day, set so low you’d have to try to fall through it: a glass of water, one breath before the kitchen, one honest sentence to one person. You don’t hit a floor. It holds you up. Set the floor, and let the good days be gifts on top of it rather than debts you owe.
Intention (never “commitment”)
“Commitment” frames the work as a contract you can breach and be guilty of. “Intention” keeps it as a direction you’re moving in — truer to how change actually happens, and far kinder when life intervenes.
Self, others, and the stuff of life
Alarmed aloneness
Sarah Peyton’s phrase for the particular distress of facing something frightening with no sense of anyone alongside you. It’s close to the engine of food struggle — which is why company, not just information, is so much of the medicine. (Always credited to Sarah Peyton.)
Social Baseline Theory
James Coan’s work showing the brain treats the presence of a trusted other as a resource — self-regulation becomes physically cheaper with company. Which means doing this alone was never strength; it was the most expensive possible way to try. (Always credited to James Coan.)
SWCC — Stuff We Can’t Control (and Shit We Can’t Control)
One of the quiet gifts of this path, in two versions because they’re different and both matter: the neutral one, Stuff We Can’t Control, for the plain fact of it — the weather, the past, other people, the outcome, the falling — and the one with teeth, Shit We Can’t Control, for when it isn’t neutral at all and you’re allowed to say so. SWCC is anything not happening inside you, and the slow, body-deep learning that you truly can’t run it. The gift isn’t controlling more; it’s the exhale when you finally stop trying to control what was never yours.
SWCC has many faces — the genuinely hard, the tender complexities of motherhood and friendship, the deep habit of doing it all ourselves. Explored piece by piece in the SWCC series.
Prickly pear syndrome
What I call it when too much hard stuff arrives at once, or when my own self-care is the thing that gets set down first. It’s a moment to watch for — one of the classic times the neon sign lights up — not a moment to judge.
Tigers in the kitchen
The real threats and pressures that show up in the middle of ordinary life — the things your nervous system is right to notice. Naming them as tigers honors that the alarm is real, without letting the alarm run the whole show.
Frontload joy
Rather than earning pleasure only after the hard work is done — or reaching for an engineered substitute when depleted — you build genuine joy in early and often, so the tank isn’t empty when life applies its load. #frontloadjoy
Release (never “lose” weight)
You don’t “lose” weight — losing implies something misplaced you’ll anxiously look for. You release it, on purpose, and let it go. And the far more important thing you’re maintaining isn’t a number on a scale; it’s your recovery.
The company, and the and
And… Not Instead
The stance underneath everything I build — and the ellipsis is doing real work: it’s the pause where every other program used to demand a surrender. Every plan you’ve ever joined began with an execution: quit that, start this. I won’t ask it. Keep your plan, if it’s serving you. Keep your practitioner — they’re treasure. Keep your medication, with my blessing and your doctor’s. What I offer is company for the part no plan covers. And… not instead.
Accompaniment (not accountability)
Accountability is a watcher. Accompaniment is a companion. Accountability asks: did you do it? Accompaniment asks: how was it in there? One stands over your shoulder with a clipboard; the other walks beside you on the road — and only one of those has ever helped a nervous system change.
This is a deliberate replacement, not a softer synonym. Decades of programs offered accountability — weigh-ins, check-ins, someone to answer to — and for many of us it just relocated the judge from inside our heads to across the table. Nobody heals under surveillance. But a companion who stays through the drift and the return, who wants nothing from your numbers because there are no numbers — that changes what the road costs to walk. It’s the reason everything I build is a room and not a report card. (The presence itself is the medicine — that’s Social Baseline Theory, James Coan, always credited.)
9:40 PM (the accompaniment gap)
My shorthand for where plans actually fail. Never at the meal — you always knew what to eat; if knowing were the problem, you’d have solved this decades ago. Plans fail late, alone, kitchen light on, everything you held all day arriving at once. That was never a diet gap. It was an accompaniment gap — and once you can tell the two apart, the answer stops being a better plan.
The handoff
What becomes possible once you can name the job food has been doing. You don’t fire your most reliable friend — you thank it, and then, one shift at a time, you hand its work to things that serve you more truly: the solace shift to the woods, the two-in-the-morning shift to a room of people who know exactly what two in the morning feels like. This is the Helper Reframe’s next step — not quitting accompaniment, but widening the roster.
Resonance (not reassurance)
Reassurance says: don’t feel that — you’re fine, it’s fine, look on the bright side. Resonance says: of course you feel that — and stays. It’s the experience of being accurately felt by another person: your inner world named warmly and correctly, without anyone rushing to fix it, argue with it, or tidy it away.
The difference isn’t politeness — it’s physiology. Reassurance asks the nervous system to perform calm. Resonance gives it a reason to actually settle, because the alarm was never “something is wrong with me” — it was “I am alone with this.” Resonance ends the aloneness first; everything else becomes possible after. It’s why, in every room I hold, resonance comes before any sorting, any analysis, any advice. Resonance, not reassurance, is the medicine. (My understanding of this owes a deep bow to Sarah Peyton’s work on resonant language.)
The Ultimate Reframe
The Helper Reframe, carried all the way home. Not just asking the substance what it’s been doing for you — but formally thanking it, out loud, and releasing it with a blessing instead of a battle. It sounds crazy until you try it; gratitude, it turns out, is how the grip finally opens. (Taught in full in the Quiet Hour.)
The move underneath all of it
If you notice a single thread running through every one of these words, you’ve found the method itself. Each one is the same move, performed on a different certainty:
That’s the practice. It’s the whole practice. And this glossary is just what it leaves behind — a set of gentler words for a struggle that was never the failure you were told it was. This page grows as the work does — new words are added as they’re minted.
You were never broken. You were biological.
With love and light, Sonja
A note on care: This is teaching and language, not clinical treatment, and not a substitute for it. If your relationship with food has tipped into something that frightens you, please reach toward specialized support. You can find it at findEDhelp.com.